A case was brought on his behalf because he was jailed for so long with no charges filed against him along with other conditions that were in violation of his Constitutional rights. The before his case was to be heard by the Supreme Court charges were finally filed against him evening. It really is thought that this is only done so that the Supreme Court will never hear the case since the Bush Administration will have been found guilty of wrongdoing. Ironically, no charges were filed which had to accomplish because of the allegations of his supposed involvement to detonate a “dirty bomb.” He was charged with lesser much less specific crimes though Attorney General Ashcroft had stated as he was detained that the data against Padilla was overwhelming. Before he had been set to stand trial, Padilla’s attorney tried to argue that due to the torture he had been afflicted by therefore the period of time he had been detained he was not mentally competent to stand trial. A judge ruled he was eventually found guilty and sentenced to 17 years in prison (Martinez, 2007) that he was competent and.
On Monday April 4th, 2011 the House of Representatives reviewed the Patriot Act and voted to increase it to the 8th of December, giving the power towards the Federal Bureau of Investigation and many other federal agencies to still use roving wiretaps among other powers that overstep our rights that are constitutional. February 28th, 2011 was regarded as the very last day of this Patriot Act since no legislation that is new been passed. Using this extension, America waits for hearings to be held because of the Judiciary Committee. When it came down to voting for the extension many Republicans voted because of it and Democrats argued against the extension. However, that which was a surprise to many was the known proven fact that sixty-five Democrats voted when it comes to extension associated with Patriot Act. One in particular, Democratic Representative C. A. Dutch Ruppersberger from Maryland, the highest ranking democrat on the Intelligence Committee, want to see this extension all of the way through to 2013. Many of the 27 Republicans who voted against the extension, such as for instance Dana Rohrabacher, believe the American individuals will face a legitimate danger of out-of-control prosecutions as well as the possibility of out-of-control spy networks taking effect.
Groups such as the privacy that is electronic Center (EPIC) in addition to American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) are fighting for reform of this Patriot Act. The ACLU believes that law enforcement agencies will require advantageous asset of the bill and use of the capacity to trouble innocent members of the Muslim-American communities. On March 30th, 2011, the ACLU appeared before the House subcommittee from the dependence on reform of this Patriot Act, arguing that the Government tabs on communications without any proof is a violation of this peoples that are american basic Amendment rights. Senator Patrick Leahy felt because it did nothing to uphold the government’s accountability that he would not support the extension. EPIC used the Freedom of Information Act (FOIP) to get reports on intelligence law violations through the Intelligence Oversight Board. EPIC has spoken on one or more occasion towards the Senate Judiciary Committee to require the Attorney General to are accountable to Congress any investigations that are unlawful the Patriot Act, yet this battle still continues today.
The lives of both US citizens and immigrant are affected by the charged power for the Patriot Act.
as an example, foreigners who seek education through grants, non-citizens looking to gain permanent residency, citizenship, visas and work permits in the us are being scrutinized beneath the new requirement system associated with Patriot Act. One quite high ranking official in the usa Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) managed to make it clear then they will receive disapproval if there are any doubts regarding an applicant’s eligibility. More stringent government standards and thorough criminal background checks are simply another obstacle developed by the Patriot Act. These new rules under the Patriot Act also not in favor of almost all of the checks and balances from the Bill of Rights that has been placed into place to protect citizens’ privacy. A discomfort in what they do because their actions are subject to review if the government suspects they are engaging in anything terrorist related at that time, misuse of surveillance powers by law enforcement agencies were uncovered, including the 1974 revelation that the FBI and foreign intelligence agencies had spied on over 10,000 U.S. citizens, including Martin Luther King Jr. Today, citizens utilizing the internet in the privacy of their home feel. For Internet users, it opens the door for widespread surveillance of web surfing, e-mails and peer-to-peer systems. Also put in the middle of the arguments are companies and libraries that are public need to turn over any potentially incriminating documents accessed through their systems, in the request of federal law enforcement agencies, without giving any notification to their customers.
I believe that one components of the Patriot Act are feasible, but just with intensive oversight not merely from Congress, but in addition through the Supreme Court. Congress can be the cause by ensuring that the laws they pass usually do not go against the protections promised to Americans in the First, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments regarding the Constitution. The Supreme Court could continue steadily to review cases to make sure that the Constitution is upheld even when it comes down to cases that deal with suspected terrorists that are American citizens. Our laws have made this country what it really is but it is feared that money maybe the downfall of our nation today. The freedom of life, liberty and property has converted into greed. Terrorist acts resistant to the US terrify many Americans, however in many cases, power and money scares them more. The folks vote to have government representation nevertheless the social people must be more associated with the decision making process. In the event that you elect anyone to office as well as usually do not do the job correctly, it is as much as us as Americans to make certain that the individuals try not to stay in office. That may simply be done if people have more involved in the process that is political not merely be happy with what are the results.
The expression “land of this free” is employed too generously. The way it is currently, the Patriot Act goes against exactly what this country stands for and deprives all of us of our liberties that are civil. Some argue it is necessary to maintain order, however you cannot give limitless power to a few and expect things to come out well. In the event that Patriot Act will be kept as law, the folks it accountable who overstep or abuse the power given to them that we elect to the House of Representatives (House) and Senate need to hold the people who use. Also, the president really should not be the deciding factor in deeming an individual a “threat” or “enemy combatant” when giving an individual such a title strips them of basic human rights. They are occupying, it should be unacceptable for authorities to use tactics that are considered torture when trying to elicit information from an individual, whether that person be an American citizen or not if it is unacceptable for soldiers in war to commit crimes against the people of the nation.
The History for the Patriot Act actually goes back into the century that is eighteenth different laws put in place during war time and energy to protect the US.
The protection of our nation could paper writer be the highest as well as the most important responsibility of your government. The laws created are supposed to be within the best interest of this citizens. The power to look after their welfare and to protect them after all, the citizens give the government. Individuals with this standard of power sometimes focus on your whole without rational together with individual has to pay the price. There ought to be a limit in the power associated with the government, but if the nation’s way of life, liberty and quest for property are in jeopardy we need to consider the rational the federal government uses when governing this nation. We can’t as a nation just sit back and accept what exactly is being done. So that you can elicit change, we must stand up and do something about it.